Can a lawyer be present at mediation?

If you are at the point of separation, or you are already separated or separated, mediation might help you concentrate on the future.

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, and so it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s contemplating divorce, you have numerous choices about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best advice I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely made complex, both lawfully and financially. You can quickly make errors, and frequently those errors are irreparable. The only circumstance I can envision when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just two or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved rather quickly and cheaply. Nevertheless, I would still highly recommend that each party have their own separate lawyer review the last files.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties come to an arrangement on all aspects of their divorce. Both parties still require to consult with their own, private attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to think about prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be simpler on children since the divorce proceedings may be more peaceful.
  • Speed up an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce since you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might likewise:

  • Waste time and cash. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one spouse. If the mediator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your spouse, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or badly drafted can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal issues. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover particular properties. Given that all financial information is willingly disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation might increase negative behavior of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently find out about the wonders of mediation and how it is apparently a better, less controversial, cheaper and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. However, my greatest issue with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the conciliator is to get the celebrations to come to an arrangement– any agreement! Keep in mind, the arbitrator can not provide any recommendations. All they can do is attempt to get you to agree. Not all arrangements are excellent agreements, and in fact, in numerous cases, no agreement is better than a bad arrangement. Unless both celebrations can be relatively reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is normally not a feasible option for a lot of ladies.

Collective Divorce

Put simply, collective divorce takes place when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each work with an attorney who has actually been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the lawyers in a collective divorce is rather various than in a standard divorce.

In the collective process, you, your hubby and your particular lawyers all should sign an arrangement that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your spouse should begin all over once again and discover new lawyers. Neither celebration can use the very same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure achieves success, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. However the legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than conventional lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

However, I have found that the collaborative technique often does not work well to settle divorces including complicated monetary scenarios or when there are substantial properties. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary details (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is revealed willingly. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include services and professional practices where it is relatively easy to hide possessions and earnings.

So … as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your hubby is hiding assets/income.
  • Your partner is aggressive, and you have trouble speaking out or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most typical. These days, most of separating couples select the “conventional” model of litigated divorce.

Remember, though, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a suit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to popular belief, divorce normally does not include two individuals equally accepting end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial circumstance right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both methods rely on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged scenario, the opportunities are very high that cooperation or mediation may stop working. Why take the threat of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, losing your time and money?

The most important and most tough parts of any divorce are pertaining to an arrangement on kid custody, department of assets and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for how long). Although you desire your lawyer to be an extremely experienced arbitrator, you do not desire someone who is excessively combative, all set to eliminate over anything and whatever. An overly controversial approach will not only prolong the discomfort and substantially increase your legal charges, it will likewise be emotionally detrimental to everybody included, particularly the children.

Remember: Most divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would advise) will always aim to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t concern a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these concerns.

If you have actually tried whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both lawyers were “negotiators,” attempting to get the parties to jeopardize and come to some affordable resolution. As soon as in court, the function of each attorney changes. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their brand-new job is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their customer.

And don’t forget, once you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands very little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both celebrations to take– and that’s also why the hazard of litigating is normally such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce options: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Clearly, if you have the ability to work with your husband to make decisions and both of you are honest and sensible, then mediation or the collaborative technique may be best. If you have doubts, it is great to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top