Can a mediator settle a divorce? – 2021


Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, especially those separating or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more cost-efficient than heading to court. It decreases dispute, and your family remains in control of arrangements over kids, residential or commercial property and finance.

We work right across England and Wales and our family mediation service has over thirty years’ experience supplying specialist, professional family mediation services.

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s contemplating divorce, you have several options about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the benefits and drawbacks of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only circumstance I can envision when a Do-It-Yourself divorce might make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only 2 or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite quickly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral conciliator who assists both celebrations come to a contract on all elements of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to consult with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to think about before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be simpler on kids because the divorce proceedings may be more serene.
  • Expedite an agreement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lose time and cash. If settlements stop working, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your husband, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation arrangement that’s uneven or poorly prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal problems. Any concern of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain assets. Because all monetary details is voluntarily divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your husband might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a much better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. However, my biggest issue with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to an arrangement– any agreement! Remember, the mediator can not offer any guidance. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Unfortunately, not all contracts are excellent agreements, and in fact, oftentimes, no arrangement is better than a bad contract. Unless both celebrations can be fairly sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is typically not a viable option for many women.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce occurs when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your husband will each hire a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is quite different than in a standard divorce.

In the collective process, you, your spouse and your respective lawyers all need to sign an agreement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your spouse must begin all over once again and find brand-new attorneys. Neither party can use the exact same attorneys once again!

Even if the collective procedure achieves success, you will typically have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. But the legal process can be much quicker and less costly than traditional litigation if the collaborative procedure works.

Though, I have found that the collaborative approach typically does not work well to settle divorces including complicated monetary scenarios or when there are significant properties. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (earnings, assets and liabilities) is divulged willingly. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include services and expert practices where it is fairly simple to hide properties and income.

… as a general rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your hubby is hiding assets/income.
  • Your spouse is imperious, and you have trouble speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your hubby has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce alternative is the most common. These days, the majority of divorcing couples select the “traditional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Keep in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Since contrary to common belief, divorce usually does not include 2 individuals mutually consenting to end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, since both approaches count on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all financial info.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged scenario, the opportunities are really high that collaboration or mediation might stop working. Why take the threat of going those routes when odds are they might stop working, squandering your time and money?

The most crucial and most tough parts of any divorce are coming to a contract on child custody, department of assets and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for how long). You desire your lawyer to be an extremely competent negotiator, you don’t want somebody who is excessively combative, ready to combat over anything and everything. An excessively controversial technique will not only prolong the discomfort and significantly increase your legal charges, it will likewise be mentally destructive to everybody included, specifically the kids.

Keep in mind: Most divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would advise) will always aim to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. However if they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other celebration is entirely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to fix these problems.

If you have tried whatever else, and you do wind up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up till that point both attorneys were “arbitrators,” trying to get the parties to compromise and come to some affordable resolution. Once in court, the role of each lawyer modifications. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their brand-new job is to “win” and get the very best possible outcome for their customer.

And don’t forget, when you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both celebrations to take– and that’s also why the threat of going to court is generally such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce options: Weigh divorce options carefully. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top