Can I decline divorce mediation? – 2021

Family mediation

During mediation an independent, professionally trained mediator assists you and your ex-partner exercise a contract about issues such as:

arrangements for children after you break up (sometimes called residence or contact);.

  • kid maintenance payments.
  • financial resources (for example, what to do with your home, savings, pension, debts)

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s contemplating divorce, you have numerous options about how to continue. In general terms, you require to think about four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s have a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only circumstance I can picture when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce might be achieved quite rapidly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral conciliator who assists both celebrations come to a contract on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to consult with their own, private attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to think about before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be simpler on kids given that the divorce procedures may be more tranquil.
  • Speed up an agreement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce since you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your hubby, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or inadequately prepared can be challenged.
  • Cause legal issues. Any concern of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal specific properties. Since all monetary information is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby might potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative habits of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often find out about the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. Nevertheless, my most significant problem with mediation is that the sole function and objective of the arbitrator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any arrangement! Remember, the arbitrator can not offer any guidance. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Not all arrangements are good agreements, and in truth, in numerous cases, no agreement is much better than a bad agreement. Unless both parties can be relatively affordable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is usually not a feasible option for many women.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collective divorce occurs when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collective divorce both you and your partner will each employ a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The function of the lawyers in a collective divorce is quite various than in a conventional divorce. Each lawyer encourages and assists their customer in negotiating a settlement contract. You will meet your attorney independently and you and your attorney will also meet with your spouse and his attorney. The collaborative process may also involve other neutral professionals such as a divorce financial organizer who will help both of you resolve your monetary concerns and a coach or therapist who can assist guide both of you through kid custody and other emotionally charged issues.

In the collective process, you, your partner and your respective attorneys all must sign an arrangement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your spouse must begin all over once again and find new lawyers. Neither party can use the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collective procedure succeeds, you will usually need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less expensive than traditional litigation if the collective process works.

Though, I have discovered that the collective method frequently does not work well to settle divorces involving complex monetary scenarios or when there are significant assets. In collaborative divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary info (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is revealed voluntarily. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include organizations and professional practices where it is fairly simple to conceal properties and income.

… as a basic rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your spouse is concealing assets/income.
  • Your other half is aggressive, and you have trouble speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce alternative is the most common. These days, the majority of divorcing couples pick the “standard” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “litigated” does not mean the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial circumstance right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, because both techniques rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged situation, the chances are really high that partnership or mediation may stop working. Why take the risk of going those paths when odds are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most essential and most hard parts of any divorce are coming to an agreement on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for how long). You desire your attorney to be an extremely experienced arbitrator, you do not want someone who is overly combative, prepared to combat over anything and everything. An extremely controversial technique will not just prolong the pain and significantly increase your legal fees, it will likewise be mentally damaging to everyone included, especially the kids.

Keep in mind: A lot of divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would advise) will always make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. However if they can’t pertain to an affordable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, sadly, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these issues.

If you have actually tried whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both lawyers were “negotiators,” attempting to get the celebrations to jeopardize and pertain to some reasonable resolution. When in court, the function of each lawyer changes. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their brand-new task is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their customer.

And don’t forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your kids, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big threat for both celebrations to take– and that’s likewise why the threat of litigating is generally such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of recommendations about divorce options: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top