Do arbitrators cost money? – Solent Family Mediation

If you are at the point of separation, or you are already separated or divorced, mediation may assist you focus on the future.

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a woman who’s pondering divorce, you have numerous choices about how to continue. In general terms, you require to consider four broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best suggestions I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can picture when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be achieved quite quickly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple deals with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties pertain to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. The mediator might or might not be an attorney, however he/she should be extremely skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is critical for the arbitrator to be neutral and not promote for either celebration. Both parties still need to speak with their own, specific lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to think about before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be much easier on kids since the divorce procedures might be more serene.
  • Speed up a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the mediator is inexperienced or biased towards your husband, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Result in legal issues. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal specific properties. Because all monetary details is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable behavior of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often become aware of the marvels of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less controversial, cheaper and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant problem with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the conciliator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any agreement! Remember, the arbitrator can not provide any advice. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Sadly, not all agreements are excellent agreements, and in fact, oftentimes, no arrangement is much better than a bad arrangement. Unless both parties can be fairly reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is generally not a practical option for the majority of ladies.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple agrees to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each work with an attorney who has actually been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite different than in a conventional divorce.

In the collaborative process, you, your other half and your particular attorneys all need to sign an agreement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your other half need to begin all over again and discover new attorneys. Neither party can utilize the same lawyers again!

Even if the collective process is successful, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and less costly than conventional litigation if the collaborative process works.

However, I have found that the collective approach typically does not work well to settle divorces involving complex financial circumstances or when there are substantial assets. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary info (earnings, properties and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. Frequently the spouse controls the “bag strings,” and the wife is usually uninformed of the information of their financial circumstance. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the spouse to hide possessions. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve organizations and expert practices where it is fairly simple to hide assets and earnings. Additionally, the problem of valuation can be rather contentious.

… as a basic guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first three alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your spouse is concealing assets/income.
  • Your partner is domineering, and you have difficulty speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most typical. Nowadays, most of separating couples select the “traditional” model of prosecuted divorce.

Bear in mind, though, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. The huge majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a suit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to popular belief, divorce generally does not involve two people mutually agreeing to end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both techniques count on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and extremely emotionally charged situation, the chances are really high that collaboration or mediation may fail. Why take the danger of going those paths when odds are they might fail, wasting your money and time?

The most essential and most challenging parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on child custody, division of possessions and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for how long). You desire your lawyer to be a highly proficient mediator, you do not desire somebody who is extremely combative, ready to battle over anything and whatever. An extremely contentious approach will not just lengthen the discomfort and substantially increase your legal fees, it will also be mentally detrimental to everyone involved, especially the kids.

Keep in mind: Many divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would suggest) will always aim to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t pertain to a reasonable settlement or if the other party is entirely unreasonable then, sadly, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to fix these issues.

If you have actually tried everything else, and you do wind up in court, things can get actually nasty and hostile. Up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some sensible resolution. But once in court, the role of each lawyer modifications. Settlements and compromise move to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the best possible outcome for their customer.

And do not forget, when you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your home, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both parties to take– and that’s also why the threat of litigating is normally such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. If you have doubts, it is good to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top