Solent Family Mediation help families in conflict, specifically those divorcing or separating. Whatever the concerns, our competence will help you settle them

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, and so it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a female who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to think about four broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is very made complex, both legally and financially. You can quickly make errors, and typically those errors are permanent. The only circumstance I can visualize when a Do-It-Yourself divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be accomplished quite quickly and cheaply. Nonetheless, I would still extremely suggest that each celebration have their own separate attorney review the final files.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral mediator who assists both parties come to an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still require to consult with their own, specific lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to consider before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be simpler on children given that the divorce proceedings may be more peaceful.
  • Accelerate an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the arbitrator is unskilled or biased towards your husband, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal problems. Any concern of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain assets. Because all financial details is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My biggest problem with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the conciliator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any contract! Unless both parties can be fairly sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is usually not a feasible choice for many women.

Collaborative Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your husband will each employ a lawyer who has been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The role of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is rather various than in a conventional divorce.

In the collaborative process, you, your hubby and your particular attorneys all need to sign a contract that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your other half need to begin all over again and find brand-new lawyers. Neither celebration can use the exact same lawyers again!

Even if the collective procedure is successful, you will generally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than traditional litigation if the collective process works.

Regrettably, though, I have discovered that the collaborative technique typically does not work well to settle divorces involving complex financial circumstances or when there are substantial assets. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary info (earnings, assets and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. Frequently the partner manages the “purse strings,” and the wife is typically uninformed of the details of their financial situation. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the spouse to conceal properties. What’s more, many high net worth divorces involve businesses and professional practices where it is reasonably simple to hide assets and earnings. In addition, the concern of valuation can be rather controversial.

So … as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these very first three choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your husband is concealing assets/income.
  • Your hubby is imperious, and you have difficulty speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most common. Nowadays, most of separating couples select the “conventional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not suggest the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a claim.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to common belief, divorce generally does not involve two people mutually agreeing to end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, given that both techniques depend on the full cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly mentally charged circumstance, the possibilities are extremely high that partnership or mediation might stop working. Why take the risk of going those routes when odds are they might fail, wasting your money and time?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are concerning an arrangement on child custody, department of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you desire your attorney to be an extremely knowledgeable arbitrator, you don’t desire someone who is extremely combative, ready to combat over anything and whatever. An excessively contentious approach will not just extend the pain and significantly increase your legal fees, it will likewise be mentally destructive to everybody included, particularly the kids.

Remember: Most divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will constantly make every effort to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t concern a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, unfortunately, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to resolve these concerns.

Up till that point both lawyers were “arbitrators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and come to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney changes.

And don’t forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your kids, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both parties to take– which’s likewise why the threat of litigating is typically such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Obviously, if you are able to deal with your spouse to make decisions and both of you are honest and affordable, then mediation or the collaborative technique may be best. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]