Do both parents have to spend for mediation? – Solent Family Mediation

If you are at the point of separation, or you are currently separated or separated, mediation may help you concentrate on the future.

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a female who’s contemplating divorce, you have numerous options about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to think about four broad classifications of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best guidance I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can picture when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted just two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be accomplished rather quickly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral conciliator who assists both celebrations concern an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. The arbitrator may or might not be a legal representative, however he/she needs to be extremely well-versed in divorce and family law. In addition, it is crucial for the arbitrator to be neutral and not promote for either celebration. Both parties still require to speak with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to consider before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be simpler on children since the divorce proceedings might be more tranquil.
  • Expedite an agreement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and cash. If settlements fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the mediator is unskilled or biased towards your spouse, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation agreement that’s uneven or badly prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal problems. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain possessions. Given that all monetary info is voluntarily disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse might potentially hide assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase negative habits of a partner with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a better, less contentious, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the conciliator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any arrangement! Unless both celebrations can be fairly affordable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is normally not a viable alternative for a lot of ladies.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collective divorce takes place when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each hire a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite different than in a conventional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your husband and your particular attorneys all need to sign a contract that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your husband should begin all over once again and find new attorneys. Neither celebration can utilize the exact same lawyers again!

Even if the collaborative procedure achieves success, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. However the legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than standard lawsuits if the collective process works.

Unfortunately, though, I have found that the collaborative method often does not work well to settle divorces involving complicated financial scenarios or when there are substantial assets. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (income, possessions and liabilities) is divulged willingly. Typically the other half manages the “purse strings,” and the other half is typically uninformed of the information of their financial circumstance. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is typically wide open for the spouse to conceal properties. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include companies and professional practices where it is reasonably easy to conceal assets and earnings. Furthermore, the problem of valuation can be quite contentious.

… as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your husband is hiding assets/income.
  • Your partner is aggressive, and you have trouble speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most common. Nowadays, the majority of separating couples pick the “traditional” design of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. The large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a lawsuit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial situation right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged situation, the chances are extremely high that cooperation or mediation may stop working. Why take the risk of going those routes when chances are they might stop working, losing your money and time?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on child custody, department of assets and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for how long). You want your lawyer to be a highly skilled mediator, you don’t desire someone who is extremely combative, prepared to fight over anything and whatever. An overly controversial method will not just extend the discomfort and substantially increase your legal fees, it will likewise be emotionally harmful to everyone included, especially the kids.

Remember: The majority of divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would suggest) will always aim to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t pertain to a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to resolve these concerns.

Up until that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” trying to get the parties to jeopardize and come to some sensible resolution. Once in court, the role of each lawyer changes.

And don’t forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both parties to take– which’s also why the danger of litigating is usually such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Undoubtedly, if you have the ability to deal with your hubby to make decisions and both of you are sincere and sensible, then mediation or the collective approach might be best. However, if you have doubts, it is great to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top