Do I need an arbitrator for separation?


Solent Family Mediation assist households in conflict, specifically those separating or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more cost-effective than heading to court. It lowers conflict, and your household remains in control of arrangements over children, property and finance.

We work right throughout England and Wales and our family mediation service has over 30 years’ experience supplying specialist, professional family mediation services.

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, and so it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s considering divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you require to consider four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only circumstance I can envision when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce might be achieved quite rapidly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple deals with a neutral conciliator who helps both celebrations pertain to a contract on all aspects of their divorce. The arbitrator might or might not be a legal representative, but he/she needs to be very fluent in divorce and family law. In addition, it is critical for the mediator to be neutral and not promote for either celebration. Both parties still require to consult with their own, individual attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement contract.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to consider before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband because you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be easier on kids because the divorce proceedings might be more peaceful.
  • Speed up an agreement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you remain in control of your divorce because you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Enable more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Waste time and cash. If settlements stop working, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the conciliator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your spouse, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable contract. A mediation arrangement that’s lopsided or improperly prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal problems. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover particular assets. Given that all financial info is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your other half could potentially hide assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase unfavorable habits of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples typically hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, less costly and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My biggest issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the arbitrator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any contract! Unless both parties can be fairly affordable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is normally not a practical choice for the majority of females.

Collaborative Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collective divorce both you and your partner will each employ an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your partner and your respective lawyers all must sign an agreement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your other half must start all over once again and find brand-new attorneys. Neither party can utilize the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collective process is successful, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal process can be much quicker and less costly than standard lawsuits if the collective process works.

Though, I have found that the collective technique often does not work well to settle divorces involving complex monetary circumstances or when there are considerable possessions. In collaborative divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary information (earnings, assets and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces involve services and professional practices where it is reasonably simple to hide assets and income.

So … as a general rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your partner is concealing assets/income.
  • Your other half is prideful, and you have difficulty speaking out or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most common. These days, the majority of separating couples choose the “standard” model of prosecuted divorce.

Keep in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. The large majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Litigation” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Because contrary to popular belief, divorce normally does not include two people equally accepting end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial circumstance right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, since both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all financial info.

Plainly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged situation, the opportunities are really high that cooperation or mediation may stop working. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might stop working, squandering your time and money?

The most important and most challenging parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on child custody, division of possessions and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for for how long). Although you desire your attorney to be a highly skilled mediator, you do not desire someone who is overly combative, all set to eliminate over anything and everything. An overly controversial method will not only extend the pain and considerably increase your legal costs, it will also be emotionally detrimental to everybody included, especially the children.

Keep in mind: Most divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will always make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to deal with these problems.

Up up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” trying to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the role of each attorney changes.

And do not forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your kids, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big threat for both parties to take– and that’s also why the threat of litigating is generally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Obviously, if you have the ability to deal with your partner to make decisions and both of you are honest and sensible, then mediation or the collaborative approach may be best. But, if you have doubts, it is excellent to be ready with “Fallback” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top