Is it better to go to mediation before court? – 2021

Solent Family Mediation help families in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating. Whatever the issues, our know-how will assist you settle them

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a female who’s considering divorce, you have several options about how to continue. In general terms, you require to think about four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can envision when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted just 2 or 3 years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, similar incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be achieved quite quickly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral mediator who helps both celebrations pertain to a contract on all aspects of their divorce. The conciliator might or might not be a legal representative, but he/she must be very fluent in divorce and family law. In addition, it is critical for the arbitrator to be neutral and not promote for either party. Both celebrations still need to talk to their own, private attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to consider before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be simpler on children since the divorce procedures may be more serene.
  • Speed up an agreement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may likewise:

  • Waste time and money. If settlements fail, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one partner. If the conciliator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your partner, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation contract that’s uneven or badly prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal problems. Any problem of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain possessions. Because all monetary info is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your husband could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase negative habits of a partner with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, more economical and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant issue with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any arrangement! Remember, the mediator can not give any suggestions. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Not all contracts are good agreements, and in truth, in lots of cases, no agreement is much better than a bad arrangement. Unless both parties can be fairly sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is generally not a practical alternative for the majority of women.

Collective Divorce

Put simply, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your husband will each work with a lawyer who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The function of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is quite various than in a conventional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your partner and your respective attorneys all should sign an arrangement that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your partner must begin all over again and discover new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the same lawyers once again!

Even if the collective procedure achieves success, you will generally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and more economical than conventional litigation if the collaborative procedure works.

Though, I have found that the collective method often doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complex financial scenarios or when there are considerable assets. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial information (earnings, assets and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. Typically the spouse controls the “handbag strings,” and the spouse is typically uninformed of the information of their financial circumstance. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the husband to conceal properties. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces include businesses and expert practices where it is reasonably simple to conceal possessions and earnings. Furthermore, the concern of evaluation can be rather controversial.

… as a basic rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your spouse is concealing assets/income.
  • Your other half is aggressive, and you have problem speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most common. Nowadays, the majority of separating couples choose the “standard” model of prosecuted divorce.

Remember, however, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. The vast bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘performing a suit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial situation right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, considering that both approaches rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial details.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged circumstance, the chances are really high that cooperation or mediation might fail. Why take the danger of going those routes when chances are they might stop working, wasting your money and time?

The most essential and most hard parts of any divorce are concerning an agreement on kid custody, division of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for the length of time). Although you want your lawyer to be an extremely experienced negotiator, you don’t want somebody who is extremely combative, all set to combat over anything and everything. An excessively contentious technique will not only extend the discomfort and considerably increase your legal charges, it will likewise be emotionally destructive to everybody included, specifically the kids.

Remember: A lot of divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would suggest) will constantly aim to come to a sensible settlement with the other party. But if they can’t concern a sensible settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, sadly, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to fix these problems.

If you have tried whatever else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and come to some sensible resolution. When in court, the function of each lawyer changes. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the very best possible result for their customer.

And do not forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands really little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your kids, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a very big threat for both parties to take– and that’s also why the risk of going to court is typically such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of recommendations about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. If you have doubts, it is good to be all set with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top