Is mediation a legal requirement in divorce? – 2021

Solent Family Mediation assist households in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating. Whatever the problems, our proficiency will assist you settle them

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a female who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of options about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best suggestions I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only situation I can imagine when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, comparable earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be achieved rather rapidly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral conciliator who helps both celebrations come to a contract on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still require to consult with their own, specific attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement contract.

Here are a couple of pros and cons to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be simpler on children because the divorce proceedings may be more tranquil.
  • Accelerate a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the arbitrator is inexperienced or biased towards your husband, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable agreement. A mediation arrangement that’s uneven or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal problems. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover particular possessions. Because all monetary information is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your partner could potentially hide assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy behavior patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase unfavorable behavior of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less controversial, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My biggest issue with mediation is that the sole function and objective of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any contract! Unless both celebrations can be fairly sensible and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is usually not a viable option for a lot of females.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collective divorce takes place when a couple accepts work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your spouse will each employ an attorney who has actually been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather different than in a conventional divorce. Each attorney recommends and helps their customer in working out a settlement contract. You will meet with your lawyer independently and you and your lawyer will also meet with your spouse and his attorney. The collective process might also include other neutral experts such as a divorce financial organizer who will help both of you overcome your financial concerns and a coach or therapist who can assist direct both of you through kid custody and other mentally charged problems.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your spouse and your particular lawyers all should sign an agreement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your hubby should start all over once again and find brand-new lawyers. Neither party can use the very same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative process achieves success, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less expensive than standard lawsuits if the collective procedure works.

However, I have actually found that the collective method often does not work well to settle divorces involving complicated financial scenarios or when there are significant properties. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary information (income, properties and liabilities) is revealed voluntarily. Typically the hubby manages the “handbag strings,” and the partner is normally unaware of the information of their financial circumstance. When this type of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the hubby to conceal properties. What’s more, numerous high net worth divorces include organizations and expert practices where it is fairly simple to hide possessions and income. In addition, the issue of evaluation can be rather contentious.

So … as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your partner is hiding assets/income.
  • Your partner is aggressive, and you have problem speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your partner has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most typical. Nowadays, most of separating couples choose the “conventional” model of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, however, “litigated” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial scenario right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both approaches rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely emotionally charged circumstance, the opportunities are very high that partnership or mediation may stop working. Why take the risk of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, losing your time and money?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to an agreement on kid custody, department of possessions and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for how long). You want your attorney to be a highly proficient negotiator, you don’t desire someone who is extremely combative, prepared to fight over anything and everything. An extremely contentious approach will not just prolong the discomfort and substantially increase your legal costs, it will also be mentally detrimental to everybody involved, particularly the children.

Keep in mind: The majority of divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would suggest) will always make every effort to come to an affordable settlement with the other party. However if they can’t concern a sensible settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, sadly, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to solve these issues.

Up up until that point both attorneys were “mediators,” trying to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some sensible resolution. As soon as in court, the role of each attorney modifications.

And don’t forget, once you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both parties to take– and that’s likewise why the risk of litigating is generally such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Obviously, if you have the ability to deal with your hubby to make decisions and both of you are sincere and affordable, then mediation or the collective method might be best. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be prepared with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top