Should I use a conciliator or a lawyer for divorce? – Solent Family Mediation

If you are at the point of separation, or you are currently separated or divorced, mediation might assist you concentrate on the future.

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s considering divorce, you have a number of choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you require to think about 4 broad classifications of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best guidance I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is really complicated, both legally and financially. You can quickly make errors, and often those mistakes are irreparable. The only scenario I can imagine when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only two or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved rather quickly and cheaply. I would still highly recommend that each celebration have their own different attorney evaluation the final documents.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who helps both celebrations pertain to an agreement on all elements of their divorce. The mediator may or might not be an attorney, but he/she must be incredibly well-versed in divorce and family law. In addition, it is important for the arbitrator to be neutral and not promote for either party. Both parties still require to talk to their own, private attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few benefits and drawbacks to think about before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be easier on kids considering that the divorce procedures may be more serene.
  • Accelerate a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation may also:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the mediator is inexperienced or prejudiced towards your husband, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal problems. Any issue of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal particular properties. Given that all financial information is voluntarily divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your husband could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation might increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a much better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. However, my greatest problem with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any contract! Remember, the conciliator can not give any guidance. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Unfortunately, not all arrangements are excellent agreements, and in fact, in a lot of cases, no contract is better than a bad agreement. So unless both celebrations can be relatively reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a feasible choice for many ladies.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple agrees to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each work with an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The role of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collective procedure, you, your spouse and your particular lawyers all should sign an arrangement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner should begin all over again and discover new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the exact same attorneys once again!

Even if the collaborative process succeeds, you will usually need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. However the legal process can be much quicker and cheaper than standard lawsuits if the collective process works.

Though, I have actually discovered that the collective approach often does not work well to settle divorces including complicated financial situations or when there are considerable assets. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary details (income, properties and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include services and professional practices where it is reasonably easy to conceal assets and income.

… as a general guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your other half is concealing assets/income.
  • Your spouse is imperious, and you have difficulty speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce option is the most common. These days, most of divorcing couples select the “standard” design of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not imply the divorce ends up in court. The large majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, given that both methods rely on the full cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Clearly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly mentally charged scenario, the possibilities are very high that partnership or mediation might stop working. Why take the risk of going those paths when odds are they might fail, losing your money and time?

The most crucial and most challenging parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on child custody, department of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for how long). Although you want your lawyer to be a highly competent arbitrator, you do not want somebody who is extremely combative, all set to eliminate over anything and whatever. An excessively controversial method will not only lengthen the discomfort and considerably increase your legal costs, it will likewise be mentally harmful to everybody involved, specifically the kids.

Keep in mind: A lot of divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would suggest) will always aim to come to an affordable settlement with the other celebration. However if they can’t come to a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to resolve these problems.

Up till that point both attorneys were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some affordable resolution. Once in court, the function of each lawyer changes.

And don’t forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge risk for both parties to take– which’s likewise why the risk of going to court is typically such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Undoubtedly, if you are able to deal with your other half to make decisions and both of you are sincere and affordable, then mediation or the collaborative approach might be best. But, if you have doubts, it is excellent to be all set with “Fallback” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top