Should I utilize a conciliator or an attorney for divorce?


Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more economical than heading to court. It lowers conflict, and your household remains in control of arrangements over children, residential or commercial property and finance.

We work right throughout England and Wales and our family mediation service has over 30 years’ experience providing professional, expert family mediation services.

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of options about how to continue. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can envision when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just 2 or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be achieved quite rapidly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both celebrations come to an agreement on all elements of their divorce. Both parties still require to consult with their own, specific attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband because you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on kids considering that the divorce proceedings may be more peaceful.
  • Accelerate an agreement.
  • Reduce costs.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll require to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the arbitrator is unskilled or biased towards your husband, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable agreement. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or poorly drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal problems. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover particular properties. Since all monetary details is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your other half might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable behavior of a partner with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, less costly and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My biggest issue with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the arbitrator is to get the parties to come to an agreement– any arrangement! Unless both celebrations can be relatively sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a feasible choice for a lot of women.

Collaborative Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce occurs when a couple agrees to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collective divorce both you and your partner will each hire an attorney who has actually been trained in the collective divorce process. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is rather different than in a conventional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your partner and your particular lawyers all must sign an arrangement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this occurs, both you and your hubby should start all over once again and find new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the same lawyers again!

Even if the collaborative procedure is successful, you will normally need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less expensive than standard lawsuits if the collective process works.

Though, I have found that the collective method often doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complex financial circumstances or when there are significant possessions. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary information (earnings, assets and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. Typically the other half manages the “handbag strings,” and the partner is typically uninformed of the information of their monetary circumstance. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is typically wide open for the partner to hide possessions. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include organizations and professional practices where it is reasonably simple to conceal possessions and earnings. Additionally, the issue of assessment can be quite contentious.

So … as a basic guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these very first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You believe your spouse is concealing assets/income.
  • Your partner is domineering, and you have trouble speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce alternative is the most common. These days, the majority of divorcing couples choose the “traditional” model of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. The huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘performing a lawsuit.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to common belief, divorce normally does not include two individuals mutually accepting end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, because both methods count on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and highly mentally charged situation, the opportunities are extremely high that collaboration or mediation might stop working. Why take the risk of going those routes when chances are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most important and most challenging parts of any divorce are coming to an arrangement on kid custody, division of possessions and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for the length of time). You want your lawyer to be a highly competent arbitrator, you don’t want somebody who is overly combative, all set to battle over anything and whatever. An extremely contentious approach will not only extend the discomfort and substantially increase your legal costs, it will also be mentally damaging to everyone involved, particularly the kids.

Keep in mind: Most divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would recommend) will constantly strive to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. But if they can’t pertain to an affordable settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only method to deal with these problems.

If you have actually tried everything else, and you do end up in court, things can get truly nasty and hostile. Up until that point both lawyers were “negotiators,” attempting to get the parties to jeopardize and pertain to some sensible resolution. As soon as in court, the role of each attorney changes. Negotiations and compromise relocate to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the best possible result for their customer.

And don’t forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your kids, your property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both celebrations to take– which’s likewise why the risk of litigating is typically such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Obviously, if you have the ability to work with your partner to make decisions and both of you are honest and affordable, then mediation or the collaborative approach may be best. However, if you have doubts, it is excellent to be all set with “Fallback” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top