What are the stages of mediation?

Family mediation

During mediation an independent, professionally qualified arbitrator assists you and your ex-partner work out an agreement about concerns such as:

plans for children after you separate (sometimes called residence or contact);.

  • kid upkeep payments.
  • financial resources (for example, what to do with your home, savings, pension, debts)

[su_button url=”https://solentfamilymediation.co.uk/contact-us” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marriages are the same, and so it only follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of choices about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about 4 broad categories of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best guidance I can give you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is very made complex, both legally and economically. You can easily make errors, and often those mistakes are irreparable. The only situation I can envision when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only 2 or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved quite rapidly and inexpensively. However, I would still extremely advise that each celebration have their own separate attorney review the last files.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral mediator who assists both celebrations come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. The arbitrator may or may not be a lawyer, but he/she must be very skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is crucial for the mediator to be neutral and not advocate for either celebration. Both parties still require to speak with their own, private attorneys during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband because you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on kids because the divorce proceedings may be more serene.
  • Accelerate an agreement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Lose time and money. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the mediator is unskilled or biased towards your partner, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation arrangement that’s uneven or badly prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal issues. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover specific possessions. Since all monetary info is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your partner might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase negative habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest problem with mediation is that the sole function and goal of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any agreement! Unless both celebrations can be fairly reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a practical option for many women.

Collaborative Divorce

Put simply, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple accepts work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your other half will each hire an attorney who has been trained in the collaborative divorce process. The role of the lawyers in a collective divorce is quite different than in a standard divorce. Each attorney encourages and assists their customer in negotiating a settlement arrangement. You will meet your lawyer independently and you and your lawyer will likewise meet your partner and his lawyer. The collaborative process may likewise involve other neutral professionals such as a divorce monetary planner who will help both of you resolve your monetary issues and a coach or therapist who can help direct both of you through child custody and other emotionally charged problems.

In the collaborative process, you, your other half and your particular attorneys all need to sign an agreement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your husband must start all over again and find brand-new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the exact same lawyers again!

Even if the collective process achieves success, you will typically need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and less costly than standard litigation if the collaborative process works.

Regrettably, however, I have found that the collective approach typically doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complex monetary circumstances or when there are significant possessions. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all financial details (earnings, properties and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. Frequently the other half manages the “handbag strings,” and the spouse is usually uninformed of the information of their monetary situation. When this kind of inequality exists, the door is often wide open for the other half to conceal possessions. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include services and expert practices where it is reasonably simple to conceal assets and earnings. Additionally, the issue of appraisal can be rather controversial.

… as a basic guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your hubby is hiding assets/income.
  • Your husband is domineering, and you have trouble speaking out or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most typical. These days, most of divorcing couples pick the “traditional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “litigated” does not indicate the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the vast majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘performing a suit.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Since contrary to popular belief, divorce generally does not involve two people equally consenting to end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial situation right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both approaches rely on the full cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all financial information.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged scenario, the opportunities are extremely high that collaboration or mediation might fail. Why take the risk of going those paths when odds are they might stop working, wasting your time and money?

The most important and most challenging parts of any divorce are coming to an arrangement on child custody, division of properties and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for for how long). You want your attorney to be an extremely proficient mediator, you do not desire someone who is excessively combative, prepared to combat over anything and everything. An extremely controversial approach will not only prolong the pain and substantially increase your legal fees, it will likewise be emotionally damaging to everybody involved, particularly the children.

Remember: Most divorce attorneys (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will constantly strive to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to fix these issues.

If you have tried whatever else, and you do wind up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” trying to get the celebrations to compromise and pertain to some reasonable resolution. When in court, the function of each attorney modifications. Settlements and compromise transfer to the back burner. Their new task is to “win” and get the best possible result for their client.

And do not forget, when you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows really little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your children, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge danger for both parties to take– which’s also why the risk of going to court is normally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Clearly, if you have the ability to deal with your husband to make decisions and both of you are truthful and reasonable, then mediation or the collaborative technique might be best. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be all set with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top