Family mediation

During mediation an independent, expertly skilled mediator helps you and your ex-partner exercise a contract about issues such as:

plans for kids after you separate (in some cases called residence or contact);.

  • kid upkeep payments.
  • finances (for example, what to do with your house, cost savings, pension, debts)

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a woman who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best guidance I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is very complicated, both legally and economically. You can quickly make mistakes, and typically those mistakes are irreparable. The only situation I can picture when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted just two or 3 years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be achieved rather quickly and inexpensively. Nevertheless, I would still highly suggest that each party have their own separate attorney review the final documents.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral mediator who assists both celebrations come to an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to seek advice from with their own, individual lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband because you will not “fight” in court.
  • Be much easier on kids since the divorce proceedings may be more tranquil.
  • Expedite a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce since you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

Nevertheless, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your partner, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation agreement that’s uneven or improperly prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal problems. Any problem of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal certain assets. Because all monetary information is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your other half could potentially hide assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a better, less contentious, cheaper and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My biggest issue with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the parties to come to an arrangement– any agreement! Keep in mind, the arbitrator can not offer any advice. All they can do is try to get you to concur. Not all contracts are great agreements, and in reality, in lots of cases, no agreement is much better than a bad agreement. Unless both parties can be relatively reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is usually not a viable alternative for many women.

Collaborative Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce happens when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your husband will each employ an attorney who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is rather various than in a traditional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your husband and your respective lawyers all need to sign an agreement that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner must begin all over again and discover brand-new lawyers. Neither party can use the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collective process succeeds, you will typically have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. But the legal process can be much quicker and cheaper than conventional litigation if the collective process works.

Sadly, though, I have actually found that the collaborative method often does not work well to settle divorces including complicated financial scenarios or when there are substantial assets. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial information (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is revealed willingly. Frequently the husband controls the “purse strings,” and the partner is usually uninformed of the information of their financial situation. When this sort of inequality exists, the door is typically wide open for the hubby to conceal possessions. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include businesses and professional practices where it is reasonably easy to hide properties and income. Furthermore, the concern of evaluation can be quite contentious.

… as a general guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT use any of these very first three choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your spouse is concealing assets/income.
  • Your hubby is aggressive, and you have trouble speaking up or you hesitate to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most typical. Nowadays, the majority of divorcing couples select the “standard” design of litigated divorce.

Bear in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not indicate the divorce ends up in court. In fact, the vast majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a suit.’

Why are claims a part of divorce? Since contrary to common belief, divorce generally does not involve two people mutually consenting to end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial circumstance right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both techniques count on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged circumstance, the opportunities are extremely high that partnership or mediation might stop working. Why take the threat of going those paths when chances are they might stop working, losing your time and money?

The most crucial and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on kid custody, division of possessions and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for the length of time). Although you want your lawyer to be an extremely skilled mediator, you do not want somebody who is overly combative, ready to eliminate over anything and whatever. An extremely controversial approach will not only prolong the discomfort and substantially increase your legal charges, it will likewise be emotionally harmful to everyone included, specifically the children.

Remember: A lot of divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would advise) will constantly make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other party is totally unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to fix these problems.

Up until that point both attorneys were “arbitrators,” attempting to get the celebrations to compromise and come to some reasonable resolution. As soon as in court, the role of each lawyer changes.

And do not forget, once you’re in court, it’s a judge who knows really little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your kids, your home, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge danger for both celebrations to take– and that’s also why the threat of going to court is usually such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Plan B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]