What do mediators perform in divorce?

Solent Family Mediation help households in conflict, particularly those separating or separating. Whatever the problems, our know-how will help you settle them

[su_button url=”https://solentfamilymediation.co.uk/contact-us” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, therefore it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of options about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the pros and cons of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best guidance I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can envision when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce might be accomplished quite quickly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties pertain to an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. The conciliator may or might not be an attorney, but he/she must be exceptionally well-versed in divorce and family law. In addition, it is critical for the mediator to be neutral and not promote for either celebration. Both parties still need to consult with their own, private attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of pros and cons to consider before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on kids because the divorce procedures may be more peaceful.
  • Speed up a contract.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are making the decisions (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lose time and cash. If negotiations fail, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be incomplete or unduly beneficial to one spouse. If the mediator is inexperienced or biased towards your spouse, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or inadequately drafted can be challenged.
  • Cause legal complications. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover particular possessions. Since all monetary details is voluntarily divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse might possibly hide assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the last settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is apparently a much better, less contentious, less pricey and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the conciliator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any agreement! Unless both celebrations can be fairly affordable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is generally not a feasible option for many females.

Collaborative Divorce

Put simply, collective divorce happens when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your spouse will each hire an attorney who has been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The role of the lawyers in a collective divorce is rather various than in a conventional divorce.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your spouse and your particular attorneys all must sign an arrangement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your husband must start all over again and discover new lawyers. Neither party can utilize the exact same attorneys again!

Even if the collaborative process is successful, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the arrangement. The legal process can be much quicker and less pricey than conventional lawsuits if the collective procedure works.

However, I have actually discovered that the collaborative approach typically doesn’t work well to settle divorces involving complex financial situations or when there are considerable possessions. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial info (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is revealed willingly. Typically the husband manages the “purse strings,” and the wife is typically uninformed of the details of their monetary circumstance. When this type of inequality exists, the door is frequently wide open for the hubby to conceal possessions. What’s more, many high net worth divorces involve services and professional practices where it is relatively easy to conceal properties and income. Additionally, the concern of assessment can be rather contentious.

… as a basic rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You suspect your spouse is hiding assets/income.
  • Your other half is aggressive, and you have problem speaking up or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or hazard of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your children.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most common. These days, the majority of separating couples choose the “standard” design of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the vast bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘performing a claim.’

Why are lawsuits a part of divorce? Due to the fact that contrary to common belief, divorce generally does not involve 2 individuals mutually agreeing to end their marital relationship. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial scenario right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Clearly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and extremely mentally charged circumstance, the opportunities are extremely high that cooperation or mediation may fail. Why take the risk of going those routes when chances are they might stop working, losing your money and time?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are concerning an arrangement on child custody, department of assets and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you desire your lawyer to be an extremely experienced arbitrator, you do not desire somebody who is overly combative, all set to eliminate over anything and whatever. An extremely controversial method will not only prolong the discomfort and significantly increase your legal costs, it will also be emotionally destructive to everyone involved, especially the children.

Remember: Most divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would recommend) will always strive to come to a sensible settlement with the other party. If they can’t come to a sensible settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, may be the only way to deal with these issues.

Up till that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and come to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney modifications.

And do not forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows really little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge threat for both celebrations to take– and that’s likewise why the risk of litigating is normally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of recommendations about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Obviously, if you have the ability to deal with your spouse to make decisions and both of you are truthful and sensible, then mediation or the collective technique might be best. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top