If you are at the point of separation, or you are currently separated or separated, mediation might help you concentrate on the future.

[su_button url=”https://solentfamilymediation.co.uk/contact-us” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The 4 Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, and so it just follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s considering divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you require to consider four broad categories of divorce options: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best advice I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can picture when a Do-It-Yourself divorce might make any possible sense, may be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only two or three years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent earnings and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce might be accomplished quite rapidly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both parties come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still require to consult with their own, individual lawyers throughout the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a couple of benefits and drawbacks to consider prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “professional” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lead to a better long-term relationship with your ex-husband because you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be much easier on children because the divorce proceedings may be more peaceful.
  • Speed up an agreement.
  • Reduce expenditures.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is private; prosecuted divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Waste time and money. If negotiations stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one partner. If the arbitrator is inexperienced or biased towards your partner, the result could be unfavorable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable contract. A mediation contract that’s uneven or poorly prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal complications. Any issue of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to reveal specific assets. Considering that all financial details is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your partner might possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Enhance unhealthy habits patterns. If one partner is dominating and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase negative habits of a spouse with a propensity for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples often hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My greatest issue with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the parties to come to a contract– any contract! Unless both celebrations can be fairly reasonable and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is usually not a feasible choice for most ladies.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce happens when a couple accepts work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your hubby will each employ a lawyer who has been trained in the collective divorce process. The function of the lawyers in a collective divorce is quite different than in a conventional divorce. Each lawyer recommends and assists their customer in negotiating a settlement agreement. You will meet with your lawyer separately and you and your attorney will likewise consult with your other half and his attorney. The collaborative process may likewise include other neutral professionals such as a divorce monetary planner who will help both of you work through your monetary problems and a coach or therapist who can assist guide both of you through child custody and other mentally charged issues.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your hubby and your particular attorneys all must sign a contract that requires that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your spouse need to start all over once again and find new attorneys. Neither party can use the very same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure succeeds, you will generally need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. The legal process can be much quicker and less pricey than conventional lawsuits if the collaborative process works.

However, I have actually found that the collaborative approach often does not work well to settle divorces involving complex monetary situations or when there are substantial assets. In collective divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary info (income, assets and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces involve businesses and expert practices where it is reasonably simple to conceal properties and earnings.

… as a basic rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first 3 alternatives– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your hubby is hiding assets/income.
  • Your partner is aggressive, and you have trouble speaking out or you’re afraid to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your hubby has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce alternative is the most common. Nowadays, the majority of separating couples pick the “traditional” model of litigated divorce.

Remember, however, “prosecuted” does not suggest the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the large bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement arrangement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a claim.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial situation right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, given that both techniques rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary information.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and extremely emotionally charged scenario, the chances are very high that collaboration or mediation might stop working. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might fail, wasting your time and money?

The most important and most challenging parts of any divorce are concerning a contract on child custody, division of assets and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you want your lawyer to be an extremely competent mediator, you don’t want someone who is overly combative, all set to fight over anything and everything. An overly contentious technique will not only extend the discomfort and considerably increase your legal costs, it will likewise be mentally harmful to everyone involved, specifically the children.

Keep in mind: A lot of divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would suggest) will constantly strive to come to a sensible settlement with the other party. But if they can’t pertain to a reasonable settlement or if the other party is entirely unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to solve these problems.

Up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and come to some affordable resolution. Once in court, the role of each lawyer changes.

And don’t forget, once you remain in court, it’s a judge who knows extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your residential or commercial property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big risk for both celebrations to take– which’s likewise why the risk of going to court is normally such a great deterrent.

Here’s my last word of guidance about divorce options: Weigh divorce options thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Certainly, if you have the ability to deal with your spouse to make decisions and both of you are sincere and reasonable, then mediation or the collective approach might be best. If you have doubts, it is good to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]