What is the difference between an arbitrator and a lawyer?

Family mediation

Throughout mediation an independent, professionally experienced mediator helps you and your ex-partner exercise a contract about problems such as:

plans for kids after you break up (sometimes called residence or contact);.

  • child maintenance payments.
  • finances (for instance, what to do with your house, cost savings, pension, financial obligations)

[su_button url=”https://solentfamilymediation.co.uk/contact-us” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, therefore it only follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a female who’s pondering divorce, you have numerous alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you require to think about four broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s have a look at the pros and cons of every one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best guidance I can provide you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

Divorce is extremely made complex, both legally and financially. You can quickly make errors, and frequently those mistakes are permanent. The only situation I can imagine when a Diy divorce might make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marriage lasted only two or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be accomplished rather quickly and cheaply. I would still extremely advise that each celebration have their own separate attorney evaluation the final documents.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral arbitrator who assists both celebrations come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. Both parties still need to consult with their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to think about before choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be much easier on children given that the divorce procedures might be more peaceful.
  • Expedite a contract.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Assist you stay in control of your divorce because you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Waste time and cash. If negotiations stop working, you’ll need to start all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the mediator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your husband, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation contract that’s lopsided or improperly drafted can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal complications. Any issue of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover specific assets. Given that all monetary info is voluntarily revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your partner could potentially hide assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy behavior patterns. If one partner is controling and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation might increase unfavorable behavior of a partner with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is reportedly a better, less contentious, less expensive and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My most significant problem with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the arbitrator is to get the parties to come to a contract– any arrangement! Unless both parties can be fairly sensible and amicable (and if they can be, why are they getting divorced???), I believe that mediation is usually not a feasible alternative for many women.

Collective Divorce

Basically, collaborative divorce takes place when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collaborative divorce both you and your husband will each work with a lawyer who has been trained in the collaborative divorce procedure. The role of the lawyers in a collective divorce is quite various than in a standard divorce.

In the collective process, you, your hubby and your particular lawyers all need to sign an agreement that needs that both lawyers withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner must start all over once again and discover new lawyers. Neither celebration can use the same lawyers again!

Even if the collaborative process achieves success, you will usually need to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. However the legal process can be much quicker and less expensive than standard litigation if the collaborative process works.

Though, I have discovered that the collective method frequently does not work well to settle divorces including complicated financial circumstances or when there are substantial assets. In collective divorce, simply as in mediation, all monetary details (earnings, assets and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. What’s more, many high net worth divorces involve organizations and professional practices where it is relatively simple to hide assets and earnings.

So … as a general rule, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these very first three options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your husband is concealing assets/income.
  • Your partner is aggressive, and you have problem speaking out or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or danger of domestic violence (physical and/or mental) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your other half has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce choice is the most typical. Nowadays, the majority of divorcing couples choose the “standard” design of prosecuted divorce.

Remember, though, “litigated” does not suggest the divorce ends up in court. The vast majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term meaning ‘carrying out a claim.’

Why are suits a part of divorce? Because contrary to common belief, divorce typically does not involve 2 people equally accepting end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party wants the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, produces an adversarial situation right from the start and often disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both approaches rely on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Plainly, if you are starting out with an adversarial and highly mentally charged scenario, the opportunities are extremely high that cooperation or mediation might fail. Why take the danger of going those routes when chances are they might stop working, squandering your money and time?

The most important and most hard parts of any divorce are concerning an agreement on kid custody, department of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (how much and for for how long). Although you want your attorney to be a highly experienced arbitrator, you do not desire somebody who is overly combative, all set to combat over anything and whatever. An extremely contentious method will not just extend the discomfort and significantly increase your legal costs, it will likewise be mentally destructive to everyone included, specifically the children.

Keep in mind: Many divorce attorneys (or at least the ones I would advise) will always make every effort to come to a reasonable settlement with the other party. If they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, unfortunately, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these concerns.

Up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” attempting to get the celebrations to jeopardize and come to some sensible resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney modifications.

And don’t forget, as soon as you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the final decisions about your children, your property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a huge threat for both parties to take– which’s also why the danger of litigating is usually such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives thoroughly. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Undoubtedly, if you have the ability to deal with your husband to make decisions and both of you are sincere and reasonable, then mediation or the collective approach might be best. If you have doubts, it is great to be prepared with “Strategy B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top