Solent Family Mediation assist families in conflict, particularly those divorcing or separating. Whatever the concerns, our competence will assist you settle them

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No two marital relationships are the same, therefore it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a lady who’s pondering divorce, you have numerous alternatives about how to continue. In general terms, you need to think about 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best recommendations I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only circumstance I can picture when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted just 2 or three years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce might be accomplished rather rapidly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple deals with a neutral arbitrator who helps both parties concern an arrangement on all elements of their divorce. The mediator may or may not be an attorney, however he/she must be very well-versed in divorce and family law. In addition, it is critical for the conciliator to be neutral and not advocate for either party. Both celebrations still need to seek advice from their own, individual lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the last divorce settlement arrangement.

Here are a few pros and cons to consider before deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Result in a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband given that you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be easier on children because the divorce proceedings might be more peaceful.
  • Accelerate an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce since you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; litigated divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might likewise:

  • Lose time and money. If settlements fail, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the arbitrator is inexperienced or biased towards your partner, the outcome could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable arrangement. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or poorly prepared can be challenged.
  • Lead to legal complications. Any issue of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to discover specific properties. Because all monetary info is willingly revealed and there is no subpoena of records, your hubby could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement might not be reasonable.
  • Fuel emotions. Mediation could increase unfavorable habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is supposedly a better, less contentious, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. My biggest problem with mediation is that the sole role and goal of the arbitrator is to get the celebrations to come to an agreement– any agreement! Unless both parties can be relatively sensible and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is normally not a practical option for the majority of females.

Collective Divorce

Put simply, collective divorce happens when a couple consents to exercise a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your spouse will each hire an attorney who has actually been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the attorneys in a collaborative divorce is quite various than in a conventional divorce. Each lawyer encourages and assists their customer in working out a settlement agreement. You will meet with your attorney independently and you and your attorney will likewise meet your other half and his attorney. The collaborative procedure may likewise include other neutral professionals such as a divorce financial planner who will help both of you overcome your financial issues and a coach or therapist who can help guide both of you through child custody and other mentally charged issues.

In the collective procedure, you, your husband and your respective lawyers all must sign a contract that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if litigation is threatened. If this happens, both you and your partner must start all over once again and discover new lawyers. Neither celebration can use the same lawyers once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure is successful, you will usually have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the contract. However the legal process can be much quicker and less costly than standard litigation if the collective process works.

Though, I have found that the collective method frequently doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complex financial scenarios or when there are substantial properties. In collective divorce, just as in mediation, all financial info (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is divulged voluntarily. Typically the partner manages the “handbag strings,” and the other half is typically unaware of the details of their monetary scenario. When this type of inequality exists, the door is typically wide open for the partner to hide possessions. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include organizations and expert practices where it is reasonably simple to hide properties and income. In addition, the issue of assessment can be rather controversial.

… as a general guideline, my suggestion is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 options– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You think your spouse is concealing assets/income.
  • Your hubby is domineering, and you have difficulty speaking out or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol addiction.

Litigated Divorce

The 4th divorce choice is the most typical. Nowadays, most of divorcing couples choose the “standard” model of prosecuted divorce.

Keep in mind, however, “litigated” does not imply the divorce ends up in court. The vast bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Lawsuits” is a legal term significance ‘performing a lawsuit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the choice to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial situation right from the start and typically disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, because both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Clearly, if you are starting with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged situation, the opportunities are very high that partnership or mediation may fail. Why take the threat of going those routes when chances are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most important and most difficult parts of any divorce are pertaining to a contract on child custody, department of properties and liabilities and alimony payments (just how much and for the length of time). Although you desire your attorney to be an extremely skilled mediator, you do not desire somebody who is overly combative, ready to combat over anything and whatever. An excessively controversial technique will not just prolong the discomfort and substantially increase your legal fees, it will likewise be mentally damaging to everybody involved, specifically the kids.

Keep in mind: Most divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would suggest) will constantly strive to come to a sensible settlement with the other party. However if they can’t come to an affordable settlement or if the other celebration is completely unreasonable then, sadly, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to resolve these concerns.

Up up until that point both lawyers were “mediators,” trying to get the celebrations to compromise and come to some sensible resolution. Once in court, the function of each attorney changes.

And do not forget, when you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a huge danger for both celebrations to take– and that’s likewise why the danger of litigating is typically such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce choices thoroughly. If you have doubts, it is excellent to be all set with “Strategy B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]