Family mediation

During mediation an independent, expertly experienced conciliator helps you and your ex-partner work out an arrangement about problems such as:

arrangements for kids after you break up (sometimes called residence or contact);.

  • kid upkeep payments.
  • financial resources (for instance, what to do with your home, cost savings, pension, financial obligations)

[su_button url=”” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marital relationships are the same, therefore it just follows that no 2 divorces will be the same, either.

If you’re a female who’s contemplating divorce, you have a number of alternatives about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to consider 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (Do It Yourself), Mediation, Collaborative and Lawsuits. Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The best advice I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only scenario I can visualize when a Do-It-Yourself divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only 2 or 3 years and there are no children, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no spousal support. In a case like that, a Diy divorce could be accomplished quite rapidly and cheaply.


In divorce mediation, a separating couple works with a neutral mediator who assists both parties come to an agreement on all elements of their divorce. The conciliator might or may not be a lawyer, but he/she must be very skilled in divorce and family law. In addition, it is critical for the conciliator to be neutral and not advocate for either party. Both celebrations still require to talk to their own, individual attorneys throughout the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement contract.

Here are a few advantages and disadvantages to consider prior to deciding if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a much better long-term relationship with your ex-husband considering that you will not “combat” in court.
  • Be simpler on children given that the divorce procedures may be more tranquil.
  • Accelerate an agreement.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Help you stay in control of your divorce due to the fact that you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Permit more discretion. Mediation is personal; prosecuted divorce is public.

However, on the “con” side, divorce mediation might also:

  • Waste time and money. If settlements fail, you’ll need to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly favorable to one spouse. If the arbitrator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your spouse, the result could be undesirable for you.
  • Lead to an unenforceable contract. A mediation agreement that’s lopsided or poorly prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal complications. Any concern of law will still require to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover particular assets. Since all monetary details is voluntarily disclosed and there is no subpoena of records, your partner could potentially conceal assets/income.
  • Strengthen unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is controling and the other is submissive, the last settlement may not be reasonable.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase negative habits of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently find out about the marvels of mediation and how it is reportedly a much better, less controversial, more economical and more “dignified” method to get a divorce. My greatest problem with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to a contract– any arrangement! Remember, the arbitrator can not offer any recommendations. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Sadly, not all contracts are good contracts, and in fact, oftentimes, no agreement is much better than a bad agreement. Unless both celebrations can be relatively reasonable and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I think that mediation is generally not a feasible option for a lot of women.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collaborative divorce occurs when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without going to court.

During a collaborative divorce both you and your other half will each employ a lawyer who has been trained in the collective divorce procedure. The function of the attorneys in a collective divorce is quite various than in a standard divorce.

In the collective process, you, your hubby and your particular attorneys all must sign an arrangement that needs that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this takes place, both you and your partner need to begin all over once again and find new attorneys. Neither celebration can utilize the exact same lawyers again!

Even if the collective procedure succeeds, you will normally have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. The legal procedure can be much quicker and less expensive than traditional lawsuits if the collective process works.

However, I have found that the collective approach often doesn’t work well to settle divorces including complex financial scenarios or when there are considerable possessions. In collaborative divorce, just as in mediation, all monetary info (earnings, possessions and liabilities) is disclosed voluntarily. What’s more, many high net worth divorces include companies and professional practices where it is fairly easy to conceal assets and income.

… as a basic rule, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT utilize any of these first 3 choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your husband is concealing assets/income.
  • Your other half is prideful, and you have difficulty speaking up or you’re afraid to voice your opinions.
  • There is a history or risk of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your spouse has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce alternative is the most common. These days, most of divorcing couples pick the “conventional” design of prosecuted divorce.

Keep in mind, however, “prosecuted” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the huge bulk of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement agreement. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a claim.’

Why are claims a part of divorce? Because contrary to popular belief, divorce typically does not include 2 people equally accepting end their marriage. In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one party desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, develops an adversarial circumstance right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collaborative divorce, since both approaches count on the complete cooperation of both parties and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary info.

Plainly, if you are starting with an adversarial and extremely emotionally charged scenario, the possibilities are really high that cooperation or mediation might stop working. Why take the danger of going those routes when odds are they might fail, losing your time and money?

The most important and most tough parts of any divorce are pertaining to an agreement on child custody, department of assets and liabilities and spousal support payments (just how much and for for how long). Although you want your lawyer to be an extremely proficient negotiator, you do not desire somebody who is extremely combative, ready to combat over anything and whatever. An overly contentious approach will not just extend the pain and significantly increase your legal fees, it will likewise be emotionally harmful to everyone included, particularly the kids.

Remember: Most divorce lawyers (or a minimum of the ones I would advise) will constantly make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other party. However if they can’t pertain to an affordable settlement or if the other party is completely unreasonable then, regrettably, litigating, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to deal with these problems.

Up until that point both lawyers were “negotiators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and come to some reasonable resolution. Once in court, the role of each attorney changes.

And don’t forget, as soon as you remain in court, it’s a judge who understands extremely little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your residential or commercial property, your money and how you live your life. That’s a very big danger for both celebrations to take– and that’s likewise why the risk of litigating is generally such an excellent deterrent.

Here’s my last word of advice about divorce alternatives: Weigh divorce choices carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is different. Undoubtedly, if you have the ability to deal with your spouse to make decisions and both of you are truthful and affordable, then mediation or the collaborative technique may be best. If you have doubts, it is great to be ready with “Plan B” which would be the litigated divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]