Who spends for mediation costs?


Solent Family Mediation help families in conflict, especially those divorcing or separating.

Our family mediation service is quicker and more cost-efficient than heading to court. It lowers conflict, and your family stays in control of arrangements over children, home and financing.

We work right throughout England and Wales and our family mediation service has more than 30 years’ experience offering expert, expert family mediation services.

[su_button url=”https://solentfamilymediation.co.uk/contact-us” style=”3d” size=”4″ wide=”yes”]Arrange a Call Back[/su_button]

The Four Divorce Alternatives

Divorce mediation

No 2 marriages are the same, and so it only follows that no two divorces will be the same, either.

In fact, if you’re a lady who’s considering divorce, you have several choices about how to proceed. In general terms, you need to think about 4 broad categories of divorce alternatives: Do-It-Yourself (DIY), Mediation, Collaborative and Litigation. Let’s have a look at the pros and cons of each one.

Do-It-Yourself Divorce

The very best suggestions I can offer you about Do-It-Yourself Divorce, is DON’T Do-It-Yourself!

The only situation I can visualize when a Diy divorce may make any possible sense, might be in a case where the marital relationship lasted only two or 3 years and there are no kids, little or no assets/debts to be divided, equivalent incomes and no alimony. In a case like that, a Do-It-Yourself divorce could be achieved rather quickly and inexpensively.


In divorce mediation, a divorcing couple works with a neutral conciliator who assists both parties come to an agreement on all aspects of their divorce. Both celebrations still need to consult with their own, private lawyers during the mediation and prior to signing the final divorce settlement agreement.

Here are a couple of pros and cons to think about prior to choosing if mediation will work for you.

On the “pro” side, divorce mediation might:

  • Lead to a much better long-lasting relationship with your ex-husband since you will not “battle” in court.
  • Be much easier on kids given that the divorce procedures might be more peaceful.
  • Accelerate an arrangement.
  • Reduce expenses.
  • Help you remain in control of your divorce since you are deciding (and the court isn’t).
  • Allow for more discretion. Mediation is private; litigated divorce is public.

On the “con” side, divorce mediation may:

  • Lose time and cash. If settlements fail, you’ll require to begin all over.
  • Be insufficient or unduly beneficial to one spouse. If the conciliator is unskilled or prejudiced towards your hubby, the outcome could be unfavorable for you.
  • Result in an unenforceable contract. A mediation contract that’s uneven or badly prepared can be challenged.
  • Result in legal complications. Any problem of law will still need to be ruled upon by the court.
  • Fail to uncover certain possessions. Since all monetary info is willingly divulged and there is no subpoena of records, your spouse could possibly conceal assets/income.
  • Reinforce unhealthy habits patterns. If one spouse is dominating and the other is submissive, the final settlement may not be fair.
  • Fuel feelings. Mediation could increase unfavorable behavior of a spouse with a tendency for physical/mental or drugs/alcohol abuse.

Couples frequently hear about the wonders of mediation and how it is apparently a better, less controversial, less costly and more “dignified” way to get a divorce. Nevertheless, my biggest problem with mediation is that the sole role and objective of the mediator is to get the celebrations to come to an arrangement– any arrangement! Keep in mind, the conciliator can not give any suggestions. All they can do is try to get you to agree. Not all agreements are good contracts, and in truth, in lots of cases, no agreement is much better than a bad contract. So unless both parties can be relatively sensible and friendly (and if they can be, why are they getting separated???), I believe that mediation is normally not a feasible choice for a lot of ladies.

Collective Divorce

Simply put, collective divorce occurs when a couple consents to work out a divorce settlement without litigating.

Throughout a collective divorce both you and your other half will each employ a lawyer who has actually been trained in the collective divorce process. The role of the lawyers in a collaborative divorce is rather different than in a conventional divorce. Each attorney advises and helps their client in negotiating a settlement agreement. You will consult with your attorney individually and you and your lawyer will likewise consult with your other half and his lawyer. The collaborative process might also include other neutral specialists such as a divorce financial organizer who will assist both of you overcome your financial concerns and a coach or therapist who can help guide both of you through child custody and other mentally charged problems.

In the collaborative procedure, you, your partner and your particular lawyers all should sign a contract that requires that both attorneys withdraw from the case if a settlement is not reached and/or if lawsuits is threatened. If this happens, both you and your husband must start all over again and discover new attorneys. Neither celebration can use the very same attorneys once again!

Even if the collaborative procedure is successful, you will usually have to appear in family court so a judge can sign the agreement. However the legal process can be much quicker and cheaper than conventional lawsuits if the collaborative procedure works.

However, I have actually discovered that the collective technique often does not work well to settle divorces involving complex monetary situations or when there are substantial possessions. In collective divorce, simply as in mediation, all financial info (earnings, properties and liabilities) is disclosed willingly. What’s more, lots of high net worth divorces include companies and expert practices where it is fairly easy to conceal assets and income.

… as a basic guideline, my recommendation is this:

Do NOT use any of these very first three choices– Do-It-Yourself Divorce, Mediation or Collaborative Divorce– if:

  • You presume your partner is concealing assets/income.
  • Your other half is aggressive, and you have difficulty speaking out or you hesitate to voice your viewpoints.
  • There is a history or threat of domestic violence (physical and/or psychological) towards you and/or your kids.
  • You or your husband has a drug/alcohol dependency.

Litigated Divorce

The fourth divorce option is the most typical. Nowadays, most of divorcing couples choose the “conventional” model of litigated divorce.

Keep in mind, though, “prosecuted” does not mean the divorce winds up in court. In fact, the vast majority of all divorce cases (more than 95 percent) reach an out-of-court settlement contract. “Litigation” is a legal term significance ‘carrying out a lawsuit.’

In 80 percent of cases, the decision to divorce is unilateral– one celebration desires the divorce and the other does not. That, by its very nature, creates an adversarial situation right from the start and frequently disqualifies mediation and collective divorce, given that both methods rely on the complete cooperation of both celebrations and the voluntary disclosure of all monetary details.

Plainly, if you are beginning with an adversarial and highly emotionally charged scenario, the possibilities are extremely high that cooperation or mediation might stop working. Why take the risk of going those paths when chances are they might fail, squandering your time and money?

The most important and most tough parts of any divorce are concerning an arrangement on child custody, division of assets and liabilities and spousal support payments (how much and for for how long). Although you want your attorney to be an extremely proficient arbitrator, you do not want someone who is overly combative, ready to eliminate over anything and whatever. An extremely controversial approach will not just prolong the pain and significantly increase your legal costs, it will likewise be mentally destructive to everyone involved, especially the kids.

Remember: Most divorce lawyers (or at least the ones I would advise) will constantly make every effort to come to a sensible settlement with the other celebration. If they can’t come to a reasonable settlement or if the other celebration is totally unreasonable then, regrettably, going to court, or threatening to do so, might be the only way to resolve these issues.

If you have tried everything else, and you do wind up in court, things can get really nasty and hostile. Up up until that point both attorneys were “negotiators,” attempting to get the parties to compromise and come to some sensible resolution. Once in court, the role of each attorney modifications. Negotiations and compromise move to the back burner. Their brand-new task is to “win” and get the very best possible outcome for their customer.

And do not forget, once you’re in court, it’s a judge who understands very little about you and your family that will make the decisions about your kids, your residential or commercial property, your cash and how you live your life. That’s a very big threat for both parties to take– which’s also why the threat of going to court is usually such a good deterrent.

Here’s my last word of suggestions about divorce options: Weigh divorce alternatives carefully. The bottom line is that every family, and every divorce, is various. Clearly, if you have the ability to work with your spouse to make decisions and both of you are truthful and affordable, then mediation or the collaborative technique may be best. If you have doubts, it is great to be all set with “Plan B” which would be the prosecuted divorce.

[su_heading]Related Articles[/su_heading]

[su_heading]Solent Family Mediation Important Links[/su_heading]

Back to Top